<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Smashing Magazine Blog Design Study</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogtipz.com/2008/07/25/smashing-magazine-blog-design-study/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogtipz.com/2008/07/25/smashing-magazine-blog-design-study/</link>
	<description>The best tips to help promote and grow your blog.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 13 May 2012 21:10:56 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kevin</title>
		<link>http://blogtipz.com/2008/07/25/smashing-magazine-blog-design-study/comment-page-1/#comment-3647</link>
		<dc:creator>Kevin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Jul 2008 05:36:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogtipz.com/?p=974#comment-3647</guid>
		<description>@shearyadi - First of all, thank you for your comment. 

As I and Smashing Magazine noted, the findings are not to be &lt;strong&gt;solely&lt;/strong&gt; used in blog design, but rather serves as a study of what the big blogs are using for their layouts.

In a sense, you can use these findings to &lt;strong&gt;experiment&lt;/strong&gt; with your design, including font use, layouts, etc.  It appears that they will be using the findings and writing posts on effective design in the future.

For example, with my fairly minimalist layout, I could easily use a two column layout, but chose to stick with a three column look, simply because I needed flexibility if I wanted to add more content to the sidebars down the road.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@shearyadi &#8211; First of all, thank you for your comment. </p>
<p>As I and Smashing Magazine noted, the findings are not to be <strong>solely</strong> used in blog design, but rather serves as a study of what the big blogs are using for their layouts.</p>
<p>In a sense, you can use these findings to <strong>experiment</strong> with your design, including font use, layouts, etc.  It appears that they will be using the findings and writing posts on effective design in the future.</p>
<p>For example, with my fairly minimalist layout, I could easily use a two column layout, but chose to stick with a three column look, simply because I needed flexibility if I wanted to add more content to the sidebars down the road.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kevin</title>
		<link>http://blogtipz.com/2008/07/25/smashing-magazine-blog-design-study/comment-page-1/#comment-66559</link>
		<dc:creator>Kevin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Jul 2008 05:36:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogtipz.com/?p=974#comment-66559</guid>
		<description>@shearyadi - First of all, thank you for your comment. 

As I and Smashing Magazine noted, the findings are not to be &lt;strong&gt;solely&lt;/strong&gt; used in blog design, but rather serves as a study of what the big blogs are using for their layouts.

In a sense, you can use these findings to &lt;strong&gt;experiment&lt;/strong&gt; with your design, including font use, layouts, etc.  It appears that they will be using the findings and writing posts on effective design in the future.

For example, with my fairly minimalist layout, I could easily use a two column layout, but chose to stick with a three column look, simply because I needed flexibility if I wanted to add more content to the sidebars down the road.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@shearyadi &#8211; First of all, thank you for your comment. </p>
<p>As I and Smashing Magazine noted, the findings are not to be <strong>solely</strong> used in blog design, but rather serves as a study of what the big blogs are using for their layouts.</p>
<p>In a sense, you can use these findings to <strong>experiment</strong> with your design, including font use, layouts, etc.  It appears that they will be using the findings and writing posts on effective design in the future.</p>
<p>For example, with my fairly minimalist layout, I could easily use a two column layout, but chose to stick with a three column look, simply because I needed flexibility if I wanted to add more content to the sidebars down the road.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: shearyadi</title>
		<link>http://blogtipz.com/2008/07/25/smashing-magazine-blog-design-study/comment-page-1/#comment-3646</link>
		<dc:creator>shearyadi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Jul 2008 02:11:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogtipz.com/?p=974#comment-3646</guid>
		<description>Smashing Magz now the center of blog designing and many will follow what they said? I don&#039;t think so, the layout design is should see the requirements, nothing is fixed/absolute in design, trends maybe.

Your blog doesn&#039;t have to be three columns just because large blogs have three columns. They may need to make the layout in three columns because their contents are heavy, so if your blog is don&#039;t have much content, why make it three columns?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Smashing Magz now the center of blog designing and many will follow what they said? I don&#8217;t think so, the layout design is should see the requirements, nothing is fixed/absolute in design, trends maybe.</p>
<p>Your blog doesn&#8217;t have to be three columns just because large blogs have three columns. They may need to make the layout in three columns because their contents are heavy, so if your blog is don&#8217;t have much content, why make it three columns?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: shearyadi</title>
		<link>http://blogtipz.com/2008/07/25/smashing-magazine-blog-design-study/comment-page-1/#comment-66558</link>
		<dc:creator>shearyadi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Jul 2008 02:11:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogtipz.com/?p=974#comment-66558</guid>
		<description>Smashing Magz now the center of blog designing and many will follow what they said? I don&#039;t think so, the layout design is should see the requirements, nothing is fixed/absolute in design, trends maybe.

Your blog doesn&#039;t have to be three columns just because large blogs have three columns. They may need to make the layout in three columns because their contents are heavy, so if your blog is don&#039;t have much content, why make it three columns?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Smashing Magz now the center of blog designing and many will follow what they said? I don&#8217;t think so, the layout design is should see the requirements, nothing is fixed/absolute in design, trends maybe.</p>
<p>Your blog doesn&#8217;t have to be three columns just because large blogs have three columns. They may need to make the layout in three columns because their contents are heavy, so if your blog is don&#8217;t have much content, why make it three columns?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Weekly Fix #4: PageRank, flea markets, and good design</title>
		<link>http://blogtipz.com/2008/07/25/smashing-magazine-blog-design-study/comment-page-1/#comment-3637</link>
		<dc:creator>Weekly Fix #4: PageRank, flea markets, and good design</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Jul 2008 20:43:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogtipz.com/?p=974#comment-3637</guid>
		<description>[...] Magazine has an extremely useful resource analyzing the designs of popular blogs on the web (via Blog Tipz). While every blog should have it&#8217;s own style, it&#8217;s always good to see what has worked [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Magazine has an extremely useful resource analyzing the designs of popular blogs on the web (via Blog Tipz). While every blog should have it&#8217;s own style, it&#8217;s always good to see what has worked [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

